Real Results, Proven Success
At Growth Digital, we don’t just talk about success; we deliver it. Our commitment to driving measurable outcomes for our clients is unwavering, and our results speak volumes. Explore our results and see how we’ve transformed businesses just like yours.
SEO Result
Top 5 Performing Keywords:
- Best Dentist Near Me – Ranked #1
- Teeth Whitening Maddingley – Ranked #1
- Dental Checkup Bacchus Marsh – Ranked #1
- One Day Crown Bacchus Marsh – Ranked #1
- One Day Crown Maddingley – Ranked #1
Performance Summary:
Our SEO strategies have achieved strong results for highly competitive local keywords in the dental niche. Five top-performing keywords are ranked consistently at #1, reflecting the success of targeted optimization efforts. These include both general and location-specific terms like “Best Dentist Near Me” and “Teeth Whitening Maddingley.”
Other keywords like “Dental Clinic Bacchus Marsh” and “Dental Braces Bacchus Marsh” are maintaining top 3 positions, while some, like “Cosmetic Dentist Bacchus Marsh” and “Dental Implants Ballarat,” present opportunities for further optimization to push them to the top.
This case study demonstrates the impact of effective keyword research, local SEO tactics, and continuous monitoring in driving significant visibility and traffic growth for our client in a competitive market.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 134,285
- Clicks: 2,304
- Conversions: 161
- Avg. CPC: $1.88
- Total Spend: $4,342.30
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 134,285 impressions, indicating a moderate reach. With 2,304 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.72%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.88 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 161 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 6.99%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $4,342.30 translates to a cost per conversion of $27.48, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Google Ads Results
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 10,891
- Clicks: 1,873
- Conversions: 66
- Avg. CPC: $6.11
- Total Spend: $11,443.52
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign garnered 10,891 impressions, reflecting a moderate level of reach. With 1,873 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 17.20%, indicating very strong audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $6.11 suggests a relatively high cost per user interaction. The campaign generated 66 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 3.55%, demonstrating effective ad targeting and relevance. The total spend of $11,443.52 translates to a cost per conversion of $172.08, indicating a high cost for acquiring each lead. Overall, while the campaign shows excellent engagement, the cost per lead is high, suggesting a need for optimizing the conversion process to reduce costs and improve efficiency.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 1,994,725
- Clicks: 33,113
- Conversions: 1,369
- Avg. CPC: $1.75
- Total Spend: $58,021.38
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 1,994,725 impressions, indicating a very broad reach. With 33,113 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.66%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.75 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 1,369 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 4.13%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $58,021.38 translates to a cost per conversion of $42.38, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
SEO Result
Top 5 Performing Keywords:
- Chiropractic clinical care in Parkwood – Ranked #2
- Spinal health chiro Canning Vale – Ranked #7
- Spinal health specialists in Southern River – Ranked #8
- Spinal health specialists Shelley Riverton – Ranked #6
- Spinal chiropractic care in Willetton – Ranked #43
Performance Summary:
Our SEO campaign has shown strong results for targeted chiropractic-related keywords, especially in specific localities. Keywords such as “Chiropractic clinical care in Parkwood” and “Spinal health chiro Canning Vale” have maintained competitive positions in search rankings (#2 and #7, respectively), indicating good visibility and relevance in these areas.
However, there are notable areas for improvement. For example, “Spinal chiropractic care in Willetton” experienced a drop from a best rank of #9 to #43, suggesting the need for targeted optimisation. Keywords like “Chiropractor Services in Southern River” and “Chiropractor Services in Bull Creek” have potential for improvement to reach the top 10 rankings.
Google Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 603,921
- Clicks: 19,426
- Conversions: 1,020
- Avg. CPC: $4.91
- Total Spend: $95,383.32
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign achieved 603,921 impressions, indicating a wide reach. With 19,426 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 3.22%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $4.91 suggests reasonable cost efficiency per user interaction. The campaign generated 1,020 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 5.25%, showing effective targeting and relevance of the ads. The total spend of $95,383.32 translates to a cost per conversion of $93.45, which is relatively high. Overall, the campaign demonstrates strong reach and a decent conversion rate but suggests a need for optimizing the cost per lead to improve overall cost efficiency and return on investment.
Google Ads Results
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 19,706
- Clicks: 1,100
- Conversions: 283
- Avg. CPC: $5.68
- Total Spend: $6,248.92
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign achieved 19,706 impressions, indicating a moderate level of reach. With 1,100 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 5.58%, reflecting reasonable audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $5.68 suggests a relatively high cost per user interaction. The campaign generated 283 conversions, resulting in a high conversion rate of 25.74%, demonstrating very effective targeting and relevance of the ads. The total spend of $6,248.92 translates to a cost per conversion of $22.07, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with high conversion rates and cost-effective lead generation, offering a solid foundation for future optimizations and strategic planning.
Google Ads Results
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 10,891
- Clicks: 1,873
- Conversions: 66
- Avg. CPC: $6.11
- Total Spend: $11,443.52
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign garnered 10,891 impressions, reflecting a moderate level of reach. With 1,873 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 17.20%, indicating very strong audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $6.11 suggests a relatively high cost per user interaction. The campaign generated 66 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 3.55%, demonstrating effective ad targeting and relevance. The total spend of $11,443.52 translates to a cost per conversion of $172.08, indicating a high cost for acquiring each lead. Overall, while the campaign shows excellent engagement, the cost per lead is high, suggesting a need for optimizing the conversion process to reduce costs and improve efficiency.
Google Ads Results
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 865,296
- Clicks: 9,957
- Conversions: 201
- Avg. CPC: $0.75
- Total Spend: $7,499.22
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign achieved 865,296 impressions, indicating a very broad reach. With 9,957 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.15%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $0.75 suggests highly cost-efficient user interaction. The campaign generated 201 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 1.90%, indicating a reasonable proportion of the engaged audience converting into leads. The total spend of $7,499.22 translates to a cost per conversion of $37.31, demonstrating an effective cost management strategy for lead acquisition. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance in terms of cost efficiency and reach, though there might be opportunities to further optimize engagement and conversion rates.
Google Ads Results
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 300,280
- Clicks: 2,813
- Conversions: 56
- Avg. CPC: $0.89
- Total Spend: $2,508.35
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign garnered 300,280 impressions, indicating a substantial reach. With 2,813 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 0.94%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $0.89 suggests cost-efficient user interaction. The campaign generated 56 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 1.99%, showing that a small portion of the engaged audience converted into leads. The total spend of $2,508.35 translates to a cost per conversion of $44.79, which is a reasonable cost for acquiring each lead. Overall, the campaign demonstrates effective cost management and reach, but there may be opportunities to improve engagement and conversion rates for better overall performance.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 134,285
- Clicks: 2,304
- Conversions: 161
- Avg. CPC: $1.88
- Total Spend: $4,342.30
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 134,285 impressions, indicating a moderate reach. With 2,304 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.72%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.88 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 161 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 6.99%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $4,342.30 translates to a cost per conversion of $27.48, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 170,474
- Clicks: 2,030
- Conversions: 115
- Avg. CPC: $1.75
- Total Spend: $3,553.01
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 170,474 impressions, indicating a substantial reach. With 2,030 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.19%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.75 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 115 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 5.66%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $3,553.01 translates to a cost per conversion of $30.90, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 138,596
- Clicks: 1,744
- Conversions: 103
- Avg. CPC: $1.74
- Total Spend: $3,034.67
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 138,596 impressions, indicating a broad reach. With 1,744 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.26%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.74 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 103 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 5.91%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $3,034.67 translates to a cost per conversion of $29.46, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows good performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
