Real Results, Proven Success
At Growth Digital, we don’t just talk about success; we deliver it. Our commitment to driving measurable outcomes for our clients is unwavering, and our results speak volumes. Explore our results and see how we’ve transformed businesses just like yours.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 262,055
- Clicks: 4,092
- Conversions: 273
- Avg. CPC: $1.50
- Total Spend: $6,124.60
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 262,055 impressions, indicating a moderate reach. With 4,092 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.56%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.50 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 273 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 6.67%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $6,124.60 translates to a cost per conversion of $22.43, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 45,901
- Clicks: 911
- Conversions: 69
- Avg. CPC: $1.47
- Total Spend: $1,340.89
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 45,901 impressions, indicating a modest reach. With 911 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.98%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.47 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 69 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 7.58%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $1,340.89 translates to a cost per conversion of $20.95, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 138,596
- Clicks: 1,744
- Conversions: 103
- Avg. CPC: $1.74
- Total Spend: $3,034.67
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 138,596 impressions, indicating a broad reach. With 1,744 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.26%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.74 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 103 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 5.91%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $3,034.67 translates to a cost per conversion of $29.46, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows good performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 161,790
- Clicks: 2,447
- Conversions: 284
- Avg. CPC: $2.36
- Total Spend: $5,778.74
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 161,790 impressions, indicating a substantial reach. With 2,447 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.51%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $2.36 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 284 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 11.61%, demonstrating very effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $5,778.74 translates to a cost per conversion of $20.86, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Google Ads Results
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 300,280
- Clicks: 2,813
- Conversions: 56
- Avg. CPC: $0.89
- Total Spend: $2,508.35
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign garnered 300,280 impressions, indicating a substantial reach. With 2,813 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 0.94%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $0.89 suggests cost-efficient user interaction. The campaign generated 56 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 1.99%, showing that a small portion of the engaged audience converted into leads. The total spend of $2,508.35 translates to a cost per conversion of $44.79, which is a reasonable cost for acquiring each lead. Overall, the campaign demonstrates effective cost management and reach, but there may be opportunities to improve engagement and conversion rates for better overall performance.
SEO Result
Top 5 Performing Keywords:
- Best Dentist Near Me – Ranked #1
- Teeth Whitening Maddingley – Ranked #1
- Dental Checkup Bacchus Marsh – Ranked #1
- One Day Crown Bacchus Marsh – Ranked #1
- One Day Crown Maddingley – Ranked #1
Performance Summary:
Our SEO strategies have achieved strong results for highly competitive local keywords in the dental niche. Five top-performing keywords are ranked consistently at #1, reflecting the success of targeted optimization efforts. These include both general and location-specific terms like “Best Dentist Near Me” and “Teeth Whitening Maddingley.”
Other keywords like “Dental Clinic Bacchus Marsh” and “Dental Braces Bacchus Marsh” are maintaining top 3 positions, while some, like “Cosmetic Dentist Bacchus Marsh” and “Dental Implants Ballarat,” present opportunities for further optimization to push them to the top.
This case study demonstrates the impact of effective keyword research, local SEO tactics, and continuous monitoring in driving significant visibility and traffic growth for our client in a competitive market.
Google Ads Results
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 865,296
- Clicks: 9,957
- Conversions: 201
- Avg. CPC: $0.75
- Total Spend: $7,499.22
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign achieved 865,296 impressions, indicating a very broad reach. With 9,957 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.15%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $0.75 suggests highly cost-efficient user interaction. The campaign generated 201 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 1.90%, indicating a reasonable proportion of the engaged audience converting into leads. The total spend of $7,499.22 translates to a cost per conversion of $37.31, demonstrating an effective cost management strategy for lead acquisition. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance in terms of cost efficiency and reach, though there might be opportunities to further optimize engagement and conversion rates.
Google Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 603,921
- Clicks: 19,426
- Conversions: 1,020
- Avg. CPC: $4.91
- Total Spend: $95,383.32
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign achieved 603,921 impressions, indicating a wide reach. With 19,426 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 3.22%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $4.91 suggests reasonable cost efficiency per user interaction. The campaign generated 1,020 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 5.25%, showing effective targeting and relevance of the ads. The total spend of $95,383.32 translates to a cost per conversion of $93.45, which is relatively high. Overall, the campaign demonstrates strong reach and a decent conversion rate but suggests a need for optimizing the cost per lead to improve overall cost efficiency and return on investment.
Google Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 11,462,203
- Clicks: 274,755
- Conversions: 18,764
- Avg. CPC: $3.48
- Total Spend: $956,748.95
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign achieved 11,462,203 impressions, indicating an extensive reach. With 274,755 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 2.40%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $3.48 suggests a reasonable cost per user interaction. The campaign generated 18,764 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 6.83%, demonstrating effective targeting and relevance of the ads. The total spend of $956,748.95 translates to a cost per conversion of $50.99, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with substantial reach and a solid conversion rate, providing a strong foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Google Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 3,276
- Clicks: 301
- Conversions: 25
- Avg. CPC: $8.70
- Total Spend: $2,618.61
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign achieved 3,276 impressions, indicating a relatively limited reach. With 301 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 9.19%, reflecting strong audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $8.70 suggests a high cost per user interaction. The campaign generated 25 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 8.53%, demonstrating effective targeting and relevance of the ads. The total spend of $2,618.61 translates to a cost per conversion of $102.02, indicating a high cost for acquiring each lead. Overall, while the campaign shows excellent engagement and a good conversion rate, the high CPC and cost per lead suggest a need for optimization to reduce costs and improve efficiency.
Google Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 6,499
- Clicks: 475
- Conversions: 55
- Avg. CPC: $2.83
- Total Spend: $1,345.98
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign garnered 6,499 impressions, indicating a limited reach. With 475 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 7.31%, reflecting good audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $2.83 suggests reasonable cost efficiency per user interaction. The campaign generated 55 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 11.58%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $1,345.98 translates to a cost per conversion of $24.47, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with high engagement and a solid conversion rate, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Google Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 12,556
- Clicks: 1,093
- Conversions: 89
- Avg. CPC: $3.37
- Total Spend: $3,678.04
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign garnered 12,556 impressions, indicating a moderate level of reach. With 1,093 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 8.71%, reflecting strong audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $3.37 suggests a reasonable cost per user interaction. The campaign generated 89 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 5.64%, demonstrating effective targeting and relevance of the ads. The total spend of $3,678.04 translates to a cost per conversion of $41.11, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows good performance with high engagement and a solid conversion rate, providing a foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Google Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 2,025,664
- Clicks: 58,210
- Conversions: 2,985
- Avg. CPC: $4.67
- Total Spend: $271,984.86
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Google Ads campaign achieved 2,025,664 impressions, indicating a very broad reach. With 58,210 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 2.87%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $4.67 suggests reasonable cost efficiency per user interaction. The campaign generated 2,985 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 5.13%, showing effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $271,984.86 translates to a cost per conversion of $91.09, which is relatively high but justified by the significant number of conversions. Overall, the campaign demonstrates strong reach and a decent conversion rate, though there might be opportunities to optimize costs further and improve the overall cost efficiency and return on investment.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 45,901
- Clicks: 911
- Conversions: 69
- Avg. CPC: $1.47
- Total Spend: $1,340.89
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 45,901 impressions, indicating a modest reach. With 911 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.98%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.47 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 69 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 7.58%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $1,340.89 translates to a cost per conversion of $20.95, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 45,901
- Clicks: 911
- Conversions: 69
- Avg. CPC: $1.47
- Total Spend: $1,340.89
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 45,901 impressions, indicating a modest reach. With 911 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.98%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.47 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 69 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 7.58%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $1,340.89 translates to a cost per conversion of $20.95, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 262,055
- Clicks: 4,092
- Conversions: 273
- Avg. CPC: $1.50
- Total Spend: $6,124.60
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 262,055 impressions, indicating a moderate reach. With 4,092 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.56%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.50 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 273 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 6.67%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $6,124.60 translates to a cost per conversion of $22.43, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 529,902
- Clicks: 5,321
- Conversions: 249
- Avg. CPC: $1.27
- Total Spend: $6,740.43
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 529,902 impressions, indicating a broad reach. With 5,321 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.00%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.27 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 249 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 4.68%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $6,740.43 translates to a cost per conversion of $12.21, indicating highly efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and very reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
Meta Ads Result
Performance Overview
- Impressions: 1,994,725
- Clicks: 33,113
- Conversions: 1,369
- Avg. CPC: $1.75
- Total Spend: $58,021.38
Brief Analysis of Performance
The Meta Ads campaign achieved 1,994,725 impressions, indicating a very broad reach. With 33,113 clicks, the Click-Through Rate (CTR) is 1.66%, reflecting moderate audience engagement. The average Cost Per Click (CPC) of $1.75 suggests cost-effective user interaction. The campaign generated 1,369 conversions, resulting in a conversion rate of 4.13%, demonstrating effective targeting and ad relevance. The total spend of $58,021.38 translates to a cost per conversion of $42.38, indicating efficient lead acquisition costs. Overall, the campaign shows strong performance with a solid conversion rate and reasonable cost per lead, providing a good foundation for further optimization and strategic planning.
SEO Result
Top 5 Performing Keywords:
- Chiropractic clinical care in Parkwood – Ranked #2
- Spinal health chiro Canning Vale – Ranked #7
- Spinal health specialists in Southern River – Ranked #8
- Spinal health specialists Shelley Riverton – Ranked #6
- Spinal chiropractic care in Willetton – Ranked #43
Performance Summary:
Our SEO campaign has shown strong results for targeted chiropractic-related keywords, especially in specific localities. Keywords such as “Chiropractic clinical care in Parkwood” and “Spinal health chiro Canning Vale” have maintained competitive positions in search rankings (#2 and #7, respectively), indicating good visibility and relevance in these areas.
However, there are notable areas for improvement. For example, “Spinal chiropractic care in Willetton” experienced a drop from a best rank of #9 to #43, suggesting the need for targeted optimisation. Keywords like “Chiropractor Services in Southern River” and “Chiropractor Services in Bull Creek” have potential for improvement to reach the top 10 rankings.
SEO Result
Top 5 Performing Keywords:
- Podiatry Services in Beldon – Ranked #1
- Expert Foot Care Services in Beldon – Ranked #1
- Podiatrist in Beldon – Ranked #1
- Foot Pain Treatment in Beldon – Ranked #1
- Podiatry Clinic in Beldon – Ranked #1
Performance Summary:
Our SEO campaign has delivered exceptional results for the client’s website, securing #1 rankings for all targeted keywords related to podiatry services in the Beldon area. This includes general terms like “Podiatry Services in Beldon” and specific phrases like “Foot Pain Treatment in Beldon” and “Expert Foot Care Services in Beldon.”
These results highlight the effectiveness of our localized SEO strategies, which include:
- Precise keyword optimisation tailored to the client’s target audience.
- High-quality content creation addressing customer needs and search intent.
- Consistent monitoring and updates to maintain top rankings.
SEO Result
Top 5 Performing Keywords:
- Best Dentist Near Me – Ranked #1
- Teeth Whitening Maddingley – Ranked #1
- Dental Checkup Bacchus Marsh – Ranked #1
- One Day Crown Bacchus Marsh – Ranked #1
- One Day Crown Maddingley – Ranked #1
Performance Summary:
Our SEO strategies have achieved strong results for highly competitive local keywords in the dental niche. Five top-performing keywords are ranked consistently at #1, reflecting the success of targeted optimization efforts. These include both general and location-specific terms like “Best Dentist Near Me” and “Teeth Whitening Maddingley.”
Other keywords like “Dental Clinic Bacchus Marsh” and “Dental Braces Bacchus Marsh” are maintaining top 3 positions, while some, like “Cosmetic Dentist Bacchus Marsh” and “Dental Implants Ballarat,” present opportunities for further optimization to push them to the top.
This case study demonstrates the impact of effective keyword research, local SEO tactics, and continuous monitoring in driving significant visibility and traffic growth for our client in a competitive market.
SEO Result
Top 5 Performing Keywords:
- Mass Management Melbourne – Ranked #1
- Mass Management Services – Ranked #2
- Mass Management Bendigo – Ranked #3
- 14 Hour Logbook – Ranked #5
- Higher Mass Limit – Ranked #7
Performance Summary:
Our targeted SEO strategy has achieved remarkable results, securing top positions for critical keywords. The Mass Management Melbourne and Mass Management Services keywords consistently rank #1 and #2, demonstrating strong regional relevance and authority. Similarly, Mass Management Bendigo has maintained its stronghold at #3. The 14 Hour Logbook keyword remains stable at #5, reflecting effective content optimisation. Although Higher Mass Limit showed a slight fluctuation, it ranks within the top 10 at #7. These results highlight the success of our focused keyword strategy and ongoing SEO efforts.
